DISCOURSE MARKERS FUNCTION IN ORAL FICTION REPORT
Kata Kunci:
discourse markers, textual and interpersonal function, oral book report.Abstrak
This research was designed to analyze the functions of discourse markers produced by student in book report presentation. Further, it is also to analyze and describe the function of each discourse marker uttered by student and dig up the most frequently use of discourse markers made by student in oral book report.
Qualitative method is applied in this research because this type of research is based on data expressed mostly in the form of words rather than on number. The writer collected the data from the transcription as the data source which is taken from oral book report in speaking six class. Analyzing the data, the writer employs Brinton’s and Alami’s theory covering two types of function; they are textual and interpersonal function.
The result of this analysis showed that usage of discourse markers helps the speaker to organize the presentation structurally so that the audiences or listeners will get the subject matters of the presentation. Further, discourse markers also can establish and maintenance the relationship between speaker and listeners.
Referensi
Husaini, U. (2013). Manajemen: Teori, Praktik, dan Riset Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi
Aksara.
Long, M., et.al. (2011). The Psychology of Education (2nd Edition). Oxon: Routledge
Falmer.
Santrock, J.W. (2011). Educational Psychology (5th Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Afrianto, A., & Inayati, A. (2016). Existential process in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secret: A systemic functional linguistic study. Teknosastik, 14(1), 26–31.
Al Falaq, J. S., & Puspita, D. (2021). CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS: REVEALING MASCULINITY THROUGH L-MEN ADVERTISEMENT. Linguistics and Literature Journal, 2(1), 62–68.
Amelia, D., & Daud, J. (2020). FREUDIAN TRIPARTITE ON DETECTIVE FICTION: THE TOKYO ZODIAC MURDERS. Language Literacy: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching, 4(2), 299–305.
Aminatun, D. (2016). Eye movements and lexical access in spoken-language comprehension: Evaluating a linking hypothesis between fixations and linguistic processing. UNS (Sebelas Maret University).
Aminatun, D., Ngadiso, N., & Marmanto, S. (2019). Applying PLEASE strategy to teach writing skill on students with different linguistic intelligence. Teknosastik, 16(1), 34–40.
Azijah, D. P. (2020). INTERPERSONAL METADISCOURSE MARKERS IN JACINDA ARDERN’S SPEECH AT CHRISTCHURCH MEMORIAL. Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia.
Eklesia, G., & Rido, A. (2020). Representation of People with HIV/AIDS in The Jakarta Post and Jakarta Globe: A Critical Discourse Analysis. TEKNOSASTIK, 18(2), 120–133.
Evayani, W., & Rido, A. (2019). Representation of Social Actors in Sexual Violence Issue in The New York Times and The Jakarta Post Newspapers: A Critical Discourse Analysis. Teknosastik, 17(2), 43–55.
Gulö, I. (2019). Predicates of Indonesian and English Simple Sentences. Teknosastik, 15(2), 76–80.
Gulö, I., & Nainggolan, T. (2021). The Functions of Nias Personal Pronouns. The 1st International Conference on Language Linguistic Literature and Education (ICLLLE).
Handayani, E. T., & Aminatun, D. (2020). STUDENTS’POINT OF VIEW ON THE USE OF WHATSAPP GROUP TO ELEVATE WRITING ABILITY. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 1(2), 31–37.
Hutauruk, M., & Puspita, D. (2020). A METAPRAGMATIC ANALYSIS: A STUDY OF PRAGMATIC FAILURE FOUND IN INDONESIAN EFL STUDENTS. Linguistics and Literature Journal, 1(2), 62–69.
Ivana, P. S. I., & Suprayogi, S. (2020). THE REPRESENTATION OF IRAN AND UNITED STATES IN DONALD TRUMP’S SPEECH: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS. Linguistics and Literature Journal, 1(2), 40–45.
Kardiansyah, M. Y. (n.d.). ENHANCING DESCRIPTIVE PARAGRAPH WRITING OF SECONDARY STUDENTS THROUGH SHARED WRITING.
Kuswoyo, H. (2016). Thematic structure in Barack Obama’s press conference: A systemic functional grammar study. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(2), 257–267.
Kuswoyo, H., & Rido, A. (2019). Process types of transitivity system in engineering lecture introduction: A pedagogic discourse. Lingua: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 19(2), 85–96.
Kuswoyo, H., Sujatna, E. T. S., Indrayani, L. M., & Rido, A. (2020). Cohesive Conjunctions and and so as Discourse Strategies in English Native and Non-Native Engineering Lecturers: A Corpus-Based Study. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(7), 2322–2335.
Kuswoyo, H., & Susardi, S. (2016). Thematic progression in EFL students’ academic writings: A systemic functional grammar study. Teknosastik, 14(2), 39–45.
Mandasari, B. (n.d.). AN ANALYSIS OF ERRORS IN STUDENTS’WRITTEN ENGLISH SENTENCES: A CASE STUDY ON INDONESIAN EFL LEARNERS. 16 November 2019, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia I.
Mandasari, B., & Aminatun, D. (2020a). IMPROVING STUDENTS’SPEAKING PERFORMANCE THROUGH VLOG. English Education: Journal of English Teaching and Research, 5(2), 136–142.
Mandasari, B., & Aminatun, D. (2020b). VLOG: A TOOL TO IMPROVE STUDENTS‟ ENGLISH SPEAKING ABILITY AT UNIVERSITY LEVEL. PROCEEDINGS UNIVERSITAS PAMULANG, 1(1).
Mandasari, B., & Wahyudin, A. Y. (2021). Flipped Classroom Learning Model: Implementation and Its Impact on EFL Learners’ Satisfaction on Grammar Class. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 8(1), 150–158.
Muliyah, P., Rekha, A., & Aminatun, D. (2020). Learning from Mistakes: Students’ Perception towards Teacher’s Attitude in Writing Correction. Lexeme: Journal of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 44–52.
Mulyasari, F., & Putri, S. N. (2020). THE IMPACT OF WHATSAPP GROUP ON UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS‟ WRITING IN THE INDONESIAN TERTIARY CONTEXT. PROCEEDINGS UNIVERSITAS PAMULANG, 1(1).
Oktaviani, L. (n.d.). ETHNIC SNAKE GAME: A STUDY ON THE USE OF MULTIMEDIA IN SPEAKING CLASS FOR ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING STUDENTS. Section Editors.
Oktaviani, L., Mandasari, B., & Maharani, R. A. (2020). IMPLEMENTING POWTOON TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’INTERNATIONAL CULTURE UNDERSTANDING IN ENGLISH CLASS. Journal of Research on Language Education, 1(1).
Puspaningtyas, N. D., & Ulfa, M. (2021). Students’ Attitudes towards the Use of Animated Video in Blended Learning. The 1st International Conference on Language Linguistic Literature and Education (ICLLLE).
Puspita, D., & Pranoto, B. E. (2021). The attitude of Japanese newspapers in narrating disaster events: Appraisal in critical discourse study. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(2), 796–817.
Putri, N., & Aminatun, D. (2021). USING FACEBOOK TO PRACTICE WRITING SKILL: WHAT DO THE STUDENTS THINK? Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 45–50.
Rido, A. (2015). The use of discourse markers as an interactive feature in science lecture discourse in L2 setting. Teflin Journal, 21(1), 90–106.
Rido, A., & Sari, F. M. (2018). Characteristics of classroom interaction of English language teachers in Indonesia and Malaysia. International Journal of Language Education, 2(1), 40–50.
Rido, A., Sari, F. M., Suri, R. A. M., & Duantoro, H. (2017). Discourse Structure of Lecture in L2 in the Indonesian Tertiary Context. Proceedings of ISELT FBS Universitas Negeri Padang, 5, 11–20.
Sinaga, R. R. F., & Oktaviani, L. (2020). The Implementation of Fun Fishing to Teach Speaking for Elementary School Students. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 1–6.
Sukerti, G. N. A., & Yuliantini, N. (2018). Learning autonomy in writing class: Implementation of project-based learning in english for spesific purposes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 953(1), 12101.
Suprayogi, S., & Novanti, E. A. (2021). EFL Learner’s Literary Competence Mapping through Reader-Response Writing Assessed using CCEA GCSE Mark Scheme. Celt: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching & Literature, 21(1), 1.
Wahyudin, A. Y. (2017). The effect of project-based learning on L2 spoken performance of undergraduate students in English for business class. Proceedings of the Ninth.
WING, L. A. S. O. F. F. (n.d.). IMPLEMENTASI KENDALI LQR UNTUK PENGENDALIAN SIKAP LONGITUDINAL PESAWAT FLYING WING.
Yulianti, T., & Sulistyawati, A. (n.d.). ENHANCING PUBLIC SPEAKING ABILITY THROUGH FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION. JURNAL PAJAR (Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran), 5(2), 287–295.
